Deleted content
@Stephen If you look at the amount of water turned into wine at the 1st miracle - which was in abundance…(and that’s consistent with all miracles… abundance) you understand that if the guests had overdrank (even 1/10th alcohol) SOME people would have been drunk… because it all depends on how much you ate, your body weight, metabolism, age, etc. This means that it actually comes down to your RESPONSIBILITY - just like choosing a life partner. Cheers mate
@Stephen Agreed, and that’s not what I am saying. Changing water into grape juice anyone can do that. All you have to do is crush some grapes. Collapsing time and causing that chemical process to happen in an instant at the micro level is, in fact, a miracle. I’m explaining that even if the wine was low in alcohol, as suggested by Rebecca, it still doesn’t mean that absolutely no one could get drunk.
The fact that God gave them the choice to choose how much to drink tells us He loved these people. He gave them FREEDOM - like it was back in the garden.
@Stephen an old man? An infant? Someone who is prone to alcohol poisoning? I don’t think you’ve thought this through…
Pretty sure as a proficient engineer, I quite sure that there is no such thing as “nobody”. There are always exceptions in statistics. You’re making the mistake of taking aggregate data and applying to individuals…
@Stephen Again, you’re saying “everyone”. Anyway, you’re repeating the mistake. You shouldn’t speak for each and every individual while not even accounting for medical conditions, age, metabolism, allergies, etc. I think I’ve already made my point previously.
@Stephen I’m going to ignore the personal attacks. I hope you hold a better job. If you read your bible you’d know the number of jars are mentioned. Again, you’re making the same mistake by asking how much alcohol an adult can consume before getting drunk - which clearly depends on a number of variables that I have already mentioned. This amount is NOT the same for everyone. That is why you should use judgement and responsibility when consuming alcohol.
Let’s assume you didn’t know the number of jars 🫙 and you didn’t have historical records of measurements used at the time. You still can’t GENERALISE and apply aggregate information to individuals by claiming with absolute certainty that NO ONE could get drunk BECAUSE of said variables.
I’m happy to discuss your line of thinking but I can’t accept your childish and abrasive language. Ironically, you’re clearly the one doing the disrespecting… I have to end this conversation thread because of that but also because you keep repeating the same mistake.